Video Game Violence Dec 7, — 8: What video games if any do you play? Why do you like them or not play any games?
Fast but Not So Furious Children who observe an adult acting violently tend to follow suit when they are frustrated. Violent games appear to be effective teachers of aggressive attitudes. Research has failed to show a causal relation between playing violent games and perpetrating violent acts. The fighting that kids engage in with video games is more akin to play than violence.
Workers at a movie theater there immediately recognized Lanza from a photograph. He was at the theater constantly, they told Mudry, but never to see movies. He came to the lobby to play an arcade game, the same one, over and over again, sometimes for eight to 10 hours a night.
Witnesses said he would whip himself into a frenzy, and on occasion the theater manager had to unplug the game to get him to leave. And like many teenaged boys, Lanza owned the typical first-person shooter, fighting and action games: The title that so consumed the Sandy Hook shooter?
Dance Dance Revolution—an arcade staple that has players dance on colored squares to the rhythm of Asian techno-pop. That discovery not only surprised investigators, it also was at odds with overheated speculation in the media and around dinner tables that violent video games had helped turn Lanza into a killer.
Yet no one knows how any of these games—Dance Dance Revolution included—might have affected a kid who was clearly struggling. The truth is that decades of research have turned up no reliable causal link between playing violent video games and perpetrating actual violence.
This is not to say that games have no effect. The notion dates at least to the Victorian era, when educators, tastemakers and clergymen began criticizing what was then a fairly raucous popular culture. Author and critic Harold Schechter, whose book Savage Pastimes lays out a social history of violent entertainment, notes that the trend divided the literati of the time.
In Catholic scholar John K. In critic and actor John Houseman lodged similar complaints about cartoons on television. In a study, Bandura and his colleagues gathered 72 preschoolers. Laboratory assistants led the kids, one at a time, into a playroom, where they sat at a small table and received instruction on how to make potato-print pictures.
Soon another adult entered the room and settled into the opposite corner with a Tinkertoy set, a mallet and a five-foot, inflated Bobo clown doll, the kind that rights itself if knocked over.
You see where this is going. Faced with the frustration of having nice new toys suddenly snatched away, the preschoolers who had watched Bobo get mistreated were more likely than the others to take out their aggression on the mini Bobo.
The conclusions seemed clear: It was the Columbine High School shootings that got many Americans thinking about violent video games.
A judge dismissed the lawsuits, but the post-Columbine uproar led more researchers to begin dissecting games, much as Bandura did for TV, in search of the roots of aggression.
Deciphering the data A few studies tried to draw distinctions between good and bad games. Participants who had played the prosocial game were twice as likely to help pick up the pencils as those who played the neutral or aggressive game.
Others have tried to tease out the aftereffects of playing violent games. Inexperienced players who played Grand Theft Auto were more likely to pick out hygienic products than were experienced players or inexperienced players who had played the driving game.
But neither of those studies make the case that these games lead to real-word violence. Although drawing conclusions about small population subgroups—such as kids at risk of violence—from broad population trends can be dicey, it is still worth noting that as violent video games proliferated in recent years, the number of violent youthful offenders fell—by more than half between andaccording to the U.
This trend is not what you would expect if these games had the power to make good boys go bad.
Indeed, in a analysis of game sales from toA. Ward of the University of Texas at Arlington found that higher rates of violent game sales actually coincided with a drop in crimes, especially violent crimes.
Jul 06, · Video Game Violence is very common today, especially with Grand Theft Auto type games. Everybody blames it the game that the Child is playing and which the parents (probably) bought for them. And I am just getting tired of everybody blamming the people who make the games, when its really the Parents/Childs fault. The Meerkat d ago. Violent Crime across the western world has reduced since the 80's. Video games consumption has increased since the 80's. Therefore Video games make the world a safer place. Even the idea that violence is contagious is still, however, a hypothesis, and the cognitive influence of video games a matter of plausible speculation rather than demonstrated fact. As with psych-lab aggression tests, understanding of video game violence soon becomes uncertain.
They concluded that any negative behavioral effects playing violent games might have are more than offset because violent people are drawn to such games, and the more they play, the less time they have for crime.
Even if violent video games are not turning people into killers, we might still wonder if they are harming our kids in subtler ways. As psychologist Douglas A. Gentile of Iowa State University puts it, whatever we practice repeatedly affects the brain.
The greatest worry is the impact on children who are already at risk. Indeed, Jenkins argued in an essay for PBS, a child who responds to a video game the same way he or she does to a real-world trauma could be showing symptoms of an emotional disturbance.
So used in the right setting, a violent game could actually serve as a diagnostic tool. But beyond such special circumstances, media effects research, with its Bobo dolls as markers of real-world aggression, is problematic.Asking Questions About Media Violence.
Submitted by Regardless of what any new evidence may conclude, however, there’s no doubt that video games and other media do influence youth, and us all. That influence may not be measurable in a laboratory, but there’s ample evidence that our values, our ideas of what’s normal and desirable.
“However, the link between violence in video games and increased aggression in players is one of the most studied and best established in the field.” “No single risk factor consistently leads a person to act aggressively or violently,” the report states.
SOCIAL STUDIES. Some video games are based on battles, wars, or other events in history. How important is it for such a game to be historically accurate?
Even the idea that violence is contagious is still, however, a hypothesis, and the cognitive influence of video games a matter of plausible speculation rather than demonstrated fact.
Feb 16, · The article "Don't Shoot: Why Video Games Really Are Linked to Violence" by Amanda Schaffer from benjaminpohle.com stated "The connection between violent games and real violence . Video game controversies are societal and scientific arguments about whether the content of video games changes the behavior and attitudes of a player, and .